With the bad things that happened with government
service delivery these days – from tanim-bala to market
fires due to bad cables – it is easy to be swayed to the opinion that this
government can never do right, and that everything in the Philippine
government, whether local or national, are all wrong. If facebook posts and tweets are measures of
the opinion of the “connected” Filipino nation (which, by the way, comprises
only around 40% of the total population), it
seems that the general sentiment is that this country is so badly-governed
that entertainment
is a happy escape from the current mess we are in.
But often we forget that there are also
many good things going on in this country’s government. I do not want to be an apologist of the
government but I want to speak of two experiences where I can say that as a
citizen, I have benefitted from government’s willingness to protect the
interest of its citizens and from government’s responsiveness to an ordinary
citizen’s questions and concerns.
Case
1: The Case of Smart Communications
I am
a post-paid subscriber of Smart
Communications for almost 10 years now and I have not had significant
complaints regarding billing until 2013. I went to South Africa on a business
trip and when I came back I was surprised to get a billing of around 80K Php
when I got back because of data charges.
I wrote to Smart that I have not used data while abroad and the giant
telco that it is, it never cared to reply.
So I
wrote to DTI’s Consumer Protection and Advocacy Division with this long letter,
which explains in full detail my allegation. I was prompted to seek the
assistance of DTI because Smart never cared about my rights as a consumer and
threatened to cut off my subscription unless I paid, and that if I continue to
question the charges, they will hand my account to the legal department for collection
and appropriate legal action.
The
letter above is self-explanatory. When
CPAD received the letter, it forwarded my concern to the National
Telecommunications Commission, who has jurisdiction over the complaint. Smart responded with a call from its customer
relations and sent letters implying that they are doing an investigation. For more than 10 months, Smart slept on my
complaint and at some points insisted on the validity of their chargers and
cutting my subscription. For the many
times that Smart did, I wrote to CPAD for support. CPAD again wrote to NTC
copying Smart and my line came alive again. This occurred for more than twice
until I wrote the following letter to NTC.
In
the subsequent letters related to this one, I wrote to the DTI and NTC that I
would like to seek advice as to what legal action I can take. It was during
this time that Smart responded positively, and finally erased the charges,
saying it was goodwill reduction. To this day, I still maintain that I did not
use data services as I use WIFI connection for data tasks in all my trips
overseas. Smart does not have the right
to charge me, so they do not have anything to reduce.
I
should credit CPAD for the responsiveness though NTC fell short of my
expectations. It is important to be
mindful, that it’s not only government that has the capacity to oppress. As my
experience suggested, business giants are more positioned to disadvantage
consumers. This even excludes how Telco
companies sell our data even without our consent.
Case
2: The case of Tagbilaran City Government
Two
months ago, I wrote in this blog about the failure of the City Government of
Tagbilaran to use its Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund. The blog entry might have reached the office
of the city mayor that weeks after, Matthew Nemenzo, the mayor’s Chief of Staff
emailed me the following:
I
emailed Mr. Nemenzo several times after this, clarifying for example some items
in the email above. Mr. Nemenzo was very responsive, and even corrected some of
the information that he already gave. It
just seemed surreal to me, that a blog writer like me, who expected that no one
reads his entries, got the attention of the highest public official in the
city.
I
should say that this is the first time that this happened to me, after writing
many times about issues concerning Bohol. I should commend the city
administration of Mayor Yap for being responsive though I also recommend that
more proactive discussions should be done with civil society organizations on
issues and concerns concerning Tagbilaran city residents be done in the future.
According to Besley and Burgess (2000:1),
“a more informed and politically active electorate strengthens incentives for
governments to be responsive”. My
experience provides evidence that such is so. The implication therefore is that when we want
to complain to government, we need to bring with us information on why we
complain, the basis of what we are complaining about, and the reason why
government should respond. Armed with
these tools, only a government who does not want to be accountable will
turn a deaf ear.
Comments